A run-of-the-mill word-to-word interlinear gloss, this one is
remarkable only for its less-than-detailed footnotes (compare Sapir's
Takelma footnotes produced 11 years earlier) and the fact that
only the source words are broken into morphemes.

It is also exemplifies some of the dangers of relying a word-to-word
alignment in this style of paraphrastic translation:  


Tu haab-il 1847 liqil u-ka-pul le-wink-ob leeti

u-haab-il tal-ob u-took-ob Săki tan nohot$ kah:

yaab pal-al tu-kim-s-ob: bĕ-šan tulakal kah-ob tu-took-ah-ob

ku {open-o}{prime}ok-ol ka-bin-ob Santa Cruz u-qaba

tak helae ti-an-ob ti buk-ah haab yaab: yet wink-il-ob

{open-o}{prime}oki u-kim-s-ik-ob: luum ut$uk man-ob nohot$:

yaab-ob šan: helae u-yum {open-o}ik bĕnil Mexico 

tun šup-ik u-taqin yetel u-meq-tan-ob yoklal u-{open-o}{prime}ok-s-ik




Tu
In

haab-il
the year

1847
1847

liqil
arose

u-ka-pul
for second time

le-wink-ob
these men (Indians)

leeti
this

u-haab-il
its year

tal-ob
they came

u-took-ob
to burn 

Sa{breve}ki
Valladolid 

tan
in the midst of

nohot$
a large
# alignment here unclear: [ in the midst of a large pueblo / Sa{breve}ki tan nohot$ kah: ]

kah:
pueblo:

yaab
yaab

pal-al

tu-kim-s-ob:

be{breve}-$an

tulakal

kah-ob

tu-took-ah-ob

ku

{open

o}{prime}ok-ol

ka-bin-ob

Santa

Cruz

u-qaba

tak

helae

ti-an-ob

ti

buk-ah

haab

yaab:

yet

wink-il-ob

{open

o}{prime}oki

u-kim-s-ik-ob:

luum

ut$uk

man-ob

nohot$:

yaab-ob

$an:

helae

u-yum

{open

o}ik

be{breve}nil

Mexico

tun

$up-ik

u-taqin

yetel

u-meq-tan-ob

yoklal

u-{open-o}{prime}ok-s-ik


/*
Comments:

levels of transcription
2

type
text

style
word to word

readability
high

analysis
none

apparatus
prose footnotes

sentence delimiters
apparently colon used for sentence delimiter in Mayan and Englsih

morpheme delimiters
dashes in source only

*/